Quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 152:10

וכל העומד לפדות כפדוי דמי דתניא רבי שמעון אומר

which may be subject to defilement in accordance with the law applicable to the defilement of food,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. Lev. XI, 34. ');">⁹</span> but there is also nothar which is not subject to defilement in accordance with the law applicable to the defilement of food. How is this so? If it remains over night before the sprinkling of the blood,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which case the portions have never been allowed to be partaken of. ');">¹⁰</span> it would not be subject to become defiled in accordance with the law applicable to the defilement of food,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As according to Bek. 9b, food cannot become defiled unless it was permitted to be made use of as food. ');">¹¹</span> but if after the sprinkling of blood,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It was left over, in which case there was a time when the portions were ritually fit as food. ');">¹²</span> it would be subject to become defiled in accordance with the law applicable to the defilement of food.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tosef. 'Uk. III, 7' in accordance with Lev. XI, 34. ');">¹³</span> Now, it is an accepted tradition that the meaning of 'before sprinkling' is 'without it first having become fit to be sprinkled' and of 'after sprinkling', 'after it became fit for sprinkling'. Hence, 'where it remained overnight without having first become fit for sprinkling' could only be where there was no time during the day to sprinkle it, such as where the sacrifice was slaughtered close upon sunset, in which case it would not be subject to become defiled in accordance with the law applicable to the defilement of food; and 'where it remained over night after it had already become fit for sprinkling,' [could only be] where there was time during the [previous] day to sprinkle it, in which case it would be subject to become defiled in accordance with the law applicable to the defilement of food.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 439. n. 9. ');">¹⁴</span> This proves that whatever is ready to be sprinkled is considered as if it had already been sprinkled.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And made the sacrifice as if ritually fit to be partaken of. ');">¹⁵</span> 'Whatever is designated for being redeemed is considered as if it had already been redeemed,' — as taught: 'R. Simeon says:

Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 152:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.